From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Cutler Subject: apache/fcgi deprecation? Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 05:12:22 +0100 Message-ID: <56B42126.7090106@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40642 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbcBEEMZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 23:12:25 -0500 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC95AB45 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 04:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development I was just browsing the RGW documentation and noticed that parts of it are still apache/fcgi-oriented (with no mention of civetweb) even in master. My impression was that civetweb is now recommended for RGW deployments as it is faster. Is that true? And is there a plan to deprecate/drop apache/fcgi support, or will it remain indefinitely? Would it be a good idea to expunge apache/fcgi from the docs and point folks to civetweb instead? -- Nathan Cutler Software Engineer Distributed Storage SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. Tel.: +420 284 084 037