From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: rgw and the next hammer release v0.94.6 Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:48:49 +0700 Message-ID: <56B437C1.2020106@dachary.org> References: <56B185DD.3050905@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:49415 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbcBEFs7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 00:48:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler , Odintsov Vladislav On 05/02/2016 08:46, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Loic Dachary wrote= : >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tre= e/hammer passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#not= e-45). Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their ow= n round of testing ? >> >=20 > Looks ok. There are also the two commits mentioned in this thread, > which I'm fine with, but it's your call with regard to the timing. I merged them. They have not been tested with a rgw suite but QE will r= un additional tests so the worst that can happen is that they fail ther= e. Thanks ! >=20 > Thanks, > Yehuda > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"= in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html