From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.6 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:10:18 +0700 Message-ID: <56B8233A.5050207@dachary.org> References: <56B18773.6000304@dachary.org> <56B2E523.9030104@dachary.org> <56B80EF0.1080000@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:60249 "EHLO relay6-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbcBHFK1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:10:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Nathan Cutler Hi, I will run a single job with https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/7501 to = verify it does work before merging it. Will that be enough ? Cheers On 08/02/2016 10:44, Gregory Farnum wrote: > Yes, just wanted those two fixes we discussed. :) >=20 > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Loic Dachary wrote= : >> Hi Greg, >> >> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own ro= und of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> >> On 04/02/2016 12:44, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Greg, >>> >>> On 03/02/2016 16:23, Gregory Farnum wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Loic Dachary wr= ote: >>>>> Hi Greg, >>>>> >>>>> The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= tree/hammer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13356#n= ote-25). A more recent run showed 3 failures and I'm not sure how to in= terpret them ( http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-01-29_03:02:05-fs-hamm= er---basic-multi/ ). >>>>> >>>>> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own= round of testing ? Or should the above errors be investigated first ? >>>> >>>> Well, one of them looks to be an infrastructure issue of some kind= =2E >>>> You appear to have figured out the fsstress one >>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14584#change-65185), and the fsx o= ne >>>> is http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14384. I'd get that quick backpo= rt >>> >>> Thanks for the pointer :-) (and to Nathan for backporting). >>> >>>> in as well (it's just a change to the qa script to point at a work= ing >>>> version of the repo). >>> >>> Do you think the hammer branch is ready for QE to start their own r= ound of testing ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> -Greg >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-dev= el" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html