From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20160208092941.6f1044da@md1em3qc> <20160208090702.GA29803@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160208101810.7aec631a@md1em3qc> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <56B87392.8040703@web.de> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:53:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160208101810.7aec631a@md1em3qc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai] mailinglist write access for non-subscribers List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Henning Schild , Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: Xenomai On 2016-02-08 10:18, Henning Schild wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:07:02 +0100 > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > = >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:29:41AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> i have been discussing the huge ioremap problem with the guy that >>> wrote the patch-set introducing the problem. And i always had this >>> list on CC, unfortunately his replies did not end up on this list >>> because he is not subscribed. >>> >>> Is the list indeed configured like that? And is that not something >>> that should be changed? = >> >> The list is subscriber-only, and this is intentional. It avoids spam. > = > I personally think an open source community should first care about > beeing open and find other ways of dealing with spam, but fair enough. FWIW, if we seriously want to work closer with the kernel community, this policy should be reconsidered. I know it's additional effort to establish some basic spam filters (unless they already exist anyway), but there is also quite some value in allowing cross-list postings with key communities. Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: