From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753679AbcBHOio (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:38:44 -0500 Received: from smtpoutz29.laposte.net ([194.117.213.104]:57747 "EHLO smtp.laposte.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753754AbcBHOim (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 09:38:42 -0500 Message-ID: <56B8A86D.7060403@laposte.net> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:38:37 +0100 From: Sebastian Frias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mason , Mans Rullgard CC: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800 driver References: <56B4A445.7080402@laposte.net> <56B4A877.4020800@laposte.net> <56B4ACC4.1000607@laposte.net> <56B4B013.5030407@laposte.net> <56B4B81D.3000108@laposte.net> <56B4BDDA.9010708@laposte.net> <56B86F44.3030806@laposte.net> <56B8A21C.5020400@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <56B8A21C.5020400@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-VR-SrcIP: 83.142.147.193 X-VR-FullState: 0 X-VR-Score: -100 X-VR-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekjedrvdejgdeihecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhf X-VR-Cause-2: ihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhs X-VR-Cause-3: ucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkfffhfgggvffufhgjtgfgsehtkegrtddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpefu X-VR-Cause-4: vggsrghsthhirghnucfhrhhirghsuceoshhfkeegsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghi X-VR-Cause-5: nhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhoiihlrggsshdrohhrghenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhp X-VR-Cause-6: ohhuthdphhgvlhhopegludejvddrvdejrddtrddvudegngdpihhnvghtpeekfedrudegvddrudegjedr X-VR-Cause-7: udelfedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsfhekgeeslhgrphhoshhtvgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehslhgr X-VR-Cause-8: shhhrdhtmhhpsehfrhgvvgdrfhhr X-VR-AvState: No X-VR-State: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/08/2016 03:11 PM, Mason wrote: > On 08/02/2016 14:37, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Sebastian Frias wrote: >> >>> By the way, I know some people like the command line, email, etc. but >>> there ought to be other tools better suited for patch review... >> >> Some kernel subsystems use http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/ to track status >> of various patches. > > There's also a kernel bugzilla, but it may be for actual bugs. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ > Thanks, and what would be the definition of a bug? I mean, would the issue from this thread qualify? Should I have created a bug report before submitting the patch?