From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm: move arch/arm/hvm.c to
	arch/arm/hvm/hvm.c
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:12:30 +0200
Message-ID: <56B8CC7E.2040309@bitdefender.com>
References: <1454950682-9459-1-git-send-email-czuzu@bitdefender.com>
	<1454950682-9459-2-git-send-email-czuzu@bitdefender.com>
	<56B8CA95.2010108@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <56B8CA95.2010108@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 2/8/2016 7:04 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/02/16 16:57, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
>> X86-side hvm.c is @ arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c. To maintain arm<->x86 symmetry,
>> also move arch/arm/hvm.c to arch/arm/hvm/hvm.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>
> For future reference, constructing your patches with -M (detect renames)
> makes reviews of patches like this far easier.
>
> While you are editing this file, please put a local variable block on
> the bottom of the file.  See the final section of CODING_STYLE in the root.
>
> ~Andrew
>
I'm really sorry, I forgot, I was actually *counting* on that option, 
wanted to use it as -M40%
actually. And I really don't get why git malformed the introductory message.
Since the diffs would indeed look *much* better w/ the -M option and I 
should also add
the variable block @ the end of that file (which was originally missing) 
would it be advised to
resend this series?

Corneliu.