From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Cutler Subject: Re: apache/fcgi deprecation? Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 00:07:20 +0100 Message-ID: <56B91FA8.8080709@suse.cz> References: <56B42126.7090106@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57229 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932113AbcBHXHY (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:07:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ken Dreyer Cc: Ceph Development On 02/08/2016 11:57 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Sure, please do it! > > I think it's just a matter of no one having time to remove it. So we could remove the FastCGI dependency from the packaging, too? > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote: >> I was just browsing the RGW documentation and noticed that parts of it are >> still apache/fcgi-oriented (with no mention of civetweb) even in master. >> >> My impression was that civetweb is now recommended for RGW deployments as it >> is faster. Is that true? And is there a plan to deprecate/drop apache/fcgi >> support, or will it remain indefinitely? >> >> Would it be a good idea to expunge apache/fcgi from the docs and point folks >> to civetweb instead? >> >> -- >> Nathan Cutler >> Software Engineer Distributed Storage >> SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. >> Tel.: +420 284 084 037 >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Nathan Cutler Software Engineer Distributed Storage SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. Tel.: +420 284 084 037