From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT9nP-0001ys-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:01:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT9nK-0006Tj-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:01:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]:32813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT9nJ-0006Tf-RD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:01:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g62so178096000wme.0 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:01:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1455020031-8268-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1455020031-8268-6-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87r3gmhu73.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56B9FF4A.8020400@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:01:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r3gmhu73.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 31/32] MAINTAINERS: add all-match entry for qemu-devel@ List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stephen Warren On 09/02/2016 14:47, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> > The fallback now relies >> > on finding a real person in MAINTAINERS, not just a mailing list for > ... in fact all lists now are. Entries with L: and without M: > > Maintained: LINUX, POSIX, i386 target > Odd fixes: GDB stub > Orphan: Gumstix, Mipssim, Stable 0.10, Stable 0.14, Stable 0.15 Not Stable 0.15 actually. > For these, we now fall back to git. Intentional? Yes, intentional. They are other instances of qemu-devel@ or, for Gumstix, qemu-arm@. For some of them it may make sense to give them an M too, for stable versions we probably should drop them. > If yes, mention it in the commit message. It is mentioned. For gumstix, it says sub-community right after where you cut it. :) "The fallback now relies on finding a real person in MAINTAINERS, not just a mailing list for the relevant sub-community". For others, there's no reason why it should be different from the catch-all entry. > If no, the easiest fix is to give them an M, if we can find a willing > victim. > > Aside: we also have entries with neither L: nor M: > > Orphan: LSI53C895A, M68K, an5206, dummy_m68k, mcf5208 > > Odd. Not too odd considering they're Orphan. :) In fact the above entries could have their L removed too (apart from Gumstix again). Paolo