From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stas Sergeev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: Add test for sigaltstack(SS_DISABLE) inside sighandler Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:17:02 +0300 Message-ID: <56BE057E.4050101@list.ru> References: <56AE3369.2090709@list.ru> <56AE33D7.1090708@list.ru> <56BE046D.4080203@osg.samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56BE046D.4080203-JPH+aEBZ4P+UEJcrhfAQsw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Shuah Khan , Linux kernel Cc: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andy Lutomirski List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org 12.02.2016 19:12, Shuah Khan =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On 01/31/2016 09:18 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: >> >> sigaltstack needs to be disabled before the signal handler can >> safely use swapcontext(). Unfortunately linux implementation of >> sigaltstack() returns EPERM in that case. >> Re-enabling is also needed and tested. >> >> CC: Shuah Khan >> CC: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> CC: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org >> CC: Andy Lutomirski >> >> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev >=20 > Hi Stas, >=20 > Is this patch v4 or Patch 1/4. Confirming to see if > I am missing 3 patches or this is supposed to be > version 4 of a single patch. Hi, I used get_maintainer.pl for the CC list, so you indeed were CCed with just this patch, which is one of 4. The series were however rejected, and I am planning to submit another one later. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751777AbcBLQRR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:17:17 -0500 Received: from smtp41.i.mail.ru ([94.100.177.101]:60407 "EHLO smtp41.i.mail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbcBLQRP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:17:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: Add test for sigaltstack(SS_DISABLE) inside sighandler To: Shuah Khan , Linux kernel References: <56AE3369.2090709@list.ru> <56AE33D7.1090708@list.ru> <56BE046D.4080203@osg.samsung.com> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski From: Stas Sergeev Message-ID: <56BE057E.4050101@list.ru> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:17:02 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56BE046D.4080203@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mras: Ok Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 12.02.2016 19:12, Shuah Khan пишет: > On 01/31/2016 09:18 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: >> >> sigaltstack needs to be disabled before the signal handler can >> safely use swapcontext(). Unfortunately linux implementation of >> sigaltstack() returns EPERM in that case. >> Re-enabling is also needed and tested. >> >> CC: Shuah Khan >> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> CC: linux-api@vger.kernel.org >> CC: Andy Lutomirski >> >> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev > > Hi Stas, > > Is this patch v4 or Patch 1/4. Confirming to see if > I am missing 3 patches or this is supposed to be > version 4 of a single patch. Hi, I used get_maintainer.pl for the CC list, so you indeed were CCed with just this patch, which is one of 4. The series were however rejected, and I am planning to submit another one later.