Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] new ib_drain_qp() API

[Steve Wise <swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>]

On 2/13/2016 10:50 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 08:32:53AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 06:10:49PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> For future submission, can you please use versioning on all patches
>>> submitted in the series and not only in cover letter?
>>>
>>> In such way, internal filtering of new emails will be more informative.
>> That's very unusual and not the git-send-email default for a reason.
>> I'd suggest you fix your 'internal filtering' instead.
> >From my perspective there are many top developers which are using
> proposed format as you said "for a reason".
>
> My flow is based on mutt mail reader and I'll be glad to hear how
> it can be fixed.
>
> Can you suggest me how do I suppose "to fix" my filtering?
> Right now, the flow is:
> 1. Open mutt
> 2. Navigate to linux-rdma mailbox
> 3. Hit "l" (limit open)
> 4. Write "new"
> 5. Get only new (unread) mails.
> 6. Read all emails and for Steve's mails only, I need to disable
> limit in order to say if it is new version of patches or old ones.
>
> P.S. get_maintainer.pl script has strange defaults too, it doesn't say
> that we need to follow blindly them.
>

The patches are threaded in that they all reference the cover letter 
email.  Is there a way you can thread your view with mutt?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html