From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:27:44 +0100 Message-ID: <56C0F150.60008@gmail.com> References: <56B770B6.7040803@gmail.com> <56B77262.7090107@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-ext4 , XFS Developers , lkml , linux-fsdevel , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux API , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Jeff Layton , Andreas Dilger List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 02/12/2016 11:25 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I'll probably have quite a few more comments on this page as I get to >> understand RichACLs better. Here's some comments from an initial >> reading. > > thanks a lot for all the feedback to the man-pages. I've more or less > made all the suggested changes but didn't get to adding examples yet > (that's not so easy). > > The changes are here: > > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl Thanks. I'll send a few further comments. But I hope to send more in the future. >> So, an initial comment. It seems to me to that this page (but >> not setrichacl(1) and getrichacl(1)) should ultimately land in >> man-pages (just like acl(7)), since we're talking about a kernel >> feature. Make sense? > > We could sure move acl(5) and richacl(7) there. We already have acl(5) (now "acl(7)" in man pages) ;-). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38753 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751430AbcBNV1w (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:27:52 -0500 Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments To: Andreas Gruenbacher References: <56B770B6.7040803@gmail.com> <56B77262.7090107@gmail.com> Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-ext4 , XFS Developers , lkml , linux-fsdevel , Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Linux API , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Jeff Layton , Andreas Dilger From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Message-ID: <56C0F150.60008@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:27:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/12/2016 11:25 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I'll probably have quite a few more comments on this page as I get to >> understand RichACLs better. Here's some comments from an initial >> reading. > > thanks a lot for all the feedback to the man-pages. I've more or less > made all the suggested changes but didn't get to adding examples yet > (that's not so easy). > > The changes are here: > > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl Thanks. I'll send a few further comments. But I hope to send more in the future. >> So, an initial comment. It seems to me to that this page (but >> not setrichacl(1) and getrichacl(1)) should ultimately land in >> man-pages (just like acl(7)), since we're talking about a kernel >> feature. Make sense? > > We could sure move acl(5) and richacl(7) there. We already have acl(5) (now "acl(7)" in man pages) ;-). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8DC7CA2 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 15:27:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CDC8F8039 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:27:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WDq2tLsfIy303Nwk (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g62so33608226wme.1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:27:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: richacl(7) man page review comments References: <56B770B6.7040803@gmail.com> <56B77262.7090107@gmail.com> From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Message-ID: <56C0F150.60008@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:27:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Linux NFS Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Linux API , Trond Myklebust , lkml , XFS Developers , "J. Bruce Fields" , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel , Jeff Layton , linux-ext4 , Anna Schumaker On 02/12/2016 11:25 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I'll probably have quite a few more comments on this page as I get to >> understand RichACLs better. Here's some comments from an initial >> reading. > > thanks a lot for all the feedback to the man-pages. I've more or less > made all the suggested changes but didn't get to adding examples yet > (that's not so easy). > > The changes are here: > > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl Thanks. I'll send a few further comments. But I hope to send more in the future. >> So, an initial comment. It seems to me to that this page (but >> not setrichacl(1) and getrichacl(1)) should ultimately land in >> man-pages (just like acl(7)), since we're talking about a kernel >> feature. Make sense? > > We could sure move acl(5) and richacl(7) there. We already have acl(5) (now "acl(7)" in man pages) ;-). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs