From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.aswsp.com ([193.34.35.150]:30851 "EHLO mail.aswsp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751461AbcBOJLF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:11:05 -0500 Message-ID: <56C19627.4030800@parrot.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:11:03 +0100 From: Gregor Boirie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Cameron , CC: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] iio: make drivers use new timestamping clock API References: <9bebbc3bdb3e22ebe28fa1c3b00cef199c54cbf6.1455184829.git.gregor.boirie@parrot.com> <56BF3B61.1020004@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <56BF3B61.1020004@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 02/13/2016 03:19 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/02/16 10:04, Gregor Boirie wrote: >> Update IIO drivers to pass IIO device as argument to iio_get_time_ns() and >> iio_get_time_res(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Gregor Boirie > Clearly you need to be careful to ensure we can build the drivers > when only patch one is applied. I'd be tempted to just merge this > into patch one. Even more fun with patch 2 vs this. > You could work some nasty macro magic, or go through a double name > change, but given the nature of the patches, perhaps leave them as > is for review and I'll splice them into a single patch at time of > application - uggly but simple ;) Ok. I'll merge all 3 patches for final submission. > > Otherwise looks fine to me. > > Jonathan > gregor