From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVFQQ-0003Yn-JT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:26:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVFQP-0006M7-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 04:26:34 -0500 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <56C0A2B2.8070202@redhat.com> <56C0A75E.4020807@redhat.com> <20160215091259.GB5244@noname.str.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56C199B9.5000400@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:26:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160215091259.GB5244@noname.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel , qemu block On 15/02/2016 10:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 14.02.2016 um 17:12 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> On 14/02/2016 16:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Reproducer: >>> >>> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ >>> -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ >>> /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 >>> >>> >>> Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing >>> migration with non-shared storage... >> >> In fact, migration with non-shared storage (migrate -b) is broken in >> general, even without -snapshot. > > Oh cool, does this mean that we can finally remove it? :-) I wouldn't object, but people are using it. :) Paolo