From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:01:34 +0000 Message-ID: <56C1A1FE.3080403@arm.com> References: <1454351299-27440-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43774 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbcBOKBh (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:01:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Sudeep Holla , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Tony Lindgren , Grygorii Strashko , Linux-OMAP , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Hi Linus, On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >> pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class >> pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag >> ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag >> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 4 ++-- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 9 ++++----- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 + >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > > Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently > of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this? > Thanks for the follow up. IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be merged together(at-least for bisectibility) > If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony? > I think so. > Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know. > Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this. -- Regards, Sudeep From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:01:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag In-Reply-To: References: <1454351299-27440-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Message-ID: <56C1A1FE.3080403@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >> pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class >> pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag >> ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag >> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 4 ++-- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 9 ++++----- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 + >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > > Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently > of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this? > Thanks for the follow up. IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be merged together(at-least for bisectibility) > If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony? > I think so. > Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know. > Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this. -- Regards, Sudeep