From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/30] xen/x86: Clear dependent features when clearing a cpu cap Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:33:17 +0000 Message-ID: <56C1EFBD.4060004@citrix.com> References: <1454679743-18133-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1454679743-18133-14-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <56C1F49002000078000D22E4@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56C1F49002000078000D22E4@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 15/02/16 14:53, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -53,8 +53,24 @@ static unsigned int cleared_caps[NCAPINTS]; >> >> void __init setup_clear_cpu_cap(unsigned int cap) >> { >> + const uint32_t *dfs; >> + unsigned int i; >> + >> + if ( test_bit(cap, cleared_caps) ) >> + return; >> + >> __clear_bit(cap, boot_cpu_data.x86_capability); >> __set_bit(cap, cleared_caps); > Perhaps __test_and_set_bit() above? Hmm yes - that won't make it atomic. And I will fix up the style issues. ~Andrew