From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Dirk Behme References: <1455568715-20880-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" From: Sudeep Holla Message-ID: <56C2EFE3.6010900@arm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:46:11 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16/02/16 07:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: [...] >> >> As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to add >> it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment. > > This is a preparatory step for adding the SYSC PM Domains. > >> I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache >> entries. >> >> Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we >> want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too. > > These are specified by ePAPR, as I said before. > Remember, DT describes the hardware, not what Linux (or any other OS) is > using. > I completely agree and I mentioned the same in the other email. -- Regards, Sudeep From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:46:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node In-Reply-To: References: <1455568715-20880-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> Message-ID: <56C2EFE3.6010900@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 16/02/16 07:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: [...] >> >> As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to add >> it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment. > > This is a preparatory step for adding the SYSC PM Domains. > >> I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache >> entries. >> >> Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we >> want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too. > > These are specified by ePAPR, as I said before. > Remember, DT describes the hardware, not what Linux (or any other OS) is > using. > I completely agree and I mentioned the same in the other email. -- Regards, Sudeep From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:46:11 +0000 Message-ID: <56C2EFE3.6010900@arm.com> References: <1455568715-20880-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Dirk Behme Cc: Sudeep Holla , Geert Uytterhoeven , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 16/02/16 07:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: [...] >> >> As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to add >> it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment. > > This is a preparatory step for adding the SYSC PM Domains. > >> I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache >> entries. >> >> Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we >> want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too. > > These are specified by ePAPR, as I said before. > Remember, DT describes the hardware, not what Linux (or any other OS) is > using. > I completely agree and I mentioned the same in the other email. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html