From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
To: fdmanana@gmail.com
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BZ#101951, Overlayfs on top of btrfs causes kernel oops + freeze
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:17:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C34BA5.8040407@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H7YYf0ntQiF4A1FQXYvRxgprQORoF-8jFe3i5T-=ELzzQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/02/16 16:11, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Colin Ian King
> <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On 16/02/16 15:51, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Colin Ian King
>>> <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101951 and also
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1532145
>>>>
>>>> Commit 4bacc9c9234c7c8eec44f5ed4e960d9f96fa0f01 ("overlayfs: Make f_path
>>>> always point to the overlay and f_inode to the underlay") resulted in an
>>>> issue when using a combination of btrfs and overlayfs. This is
>>>> noticeable when doing a fsync() on a file in a chroot with overlayfs on
>>>> top of btrfs; we hit a kernel oops in btrfs_sync_file() on
>>>> atomic_inc(&root->log_batch) because root is NULL.
>>>>
>>>> I've debugged this further and found that in btrfs_sync_file():
>>>>
>>>> struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
>>>>
>>>> does not return the inode I expected when using the stacked overlay fs,
>>>> where as:
>>>>
>>>> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>>>>
>>>> does.
>>>
>>> See the discussion at
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg48131.html
>>>
>>> You can get along with file_inode() in btrfs_sync_file(), but not
>>> later the fsync code path where we traverse the hierarchy up using
>>> dentries.
>>> More details on that thread.
>>
>> Ah, good. So was there any resolution on a way forward for a fix?
>
> Nop.
>
OK, so chroots don't work, that's a bit of a show stopper :-/
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, I'm not well at all well versed in btrfs, so I am not confident
>>>> this is a actually correct. Any comments?
>>>>
>>>> Colin
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 15:38 BZ#101951, Overlayfs on top of btrfs causes kernel oops + freeze Colin Ian King
2016-02-16 15:51 ` Filipe Manana
2016-02-16 16:08 ` Colin Ian King
2016-02-16 16:11 ` Filipe Manana
2016-02-16 16:17 ` Colin Ian King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C34BA5.8040407@canonical.com \
--to=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.