From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nayobix@nayobix.org (Boyan Vladinov) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:13:11 +0200 Subject: Process scheduling In-Reply-To: <20160217162341.GB21722@kroah.com> References: <20160213084904.GB21526@icarus.home.austad.us> <20160217162341.GB21722@kroah.com> Message-ID: <56C4E267.3010509@nayobix.org> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org Check here: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt and http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-completely-fair-scheduler/ Regards, Boyan Vladinov On 17.02.2016 18:23, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:48:33PM +0530, Nitin Varyani wrote: >> It is similar to openMosix but still quite different. Open Mosix is built on >> the top of existing linux kernels. The scheduling is taken care by the existing >> linux kernels. Open Mosix is responsible for workload distribution. This >> project is first of its kind. > No, it's not, it's been tried before, I suggest doing a bit more > research before making statements like that. > > good luck, > > greg k-h > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies at kernelnewbies.org > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies