From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1424771AbcBRDYQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:24:16 -0500 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53259 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423890AbcBRDYO (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:24:14 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20160214222221.031471863@linuxfoundation.org> <56C20749.1010405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217203016.GA29946@kroah.com> <56C4D9DE.1090405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217232651.GB31125@1wt.eu> <56C50359.5040600@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Shuah Khan X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: Samsung Open Source Group Message-ID: <56C5395B.9060002@osg.samsung.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:24:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C50359.5040600@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2016 04:33 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/17/2016 04:26 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>> Compiled, but didn't boot on my test system. >>>>> Unfortunately, I won't be able to debug this >>>>> until Wednesday. >>>> >>>> Were you able to figure this out? >>>> >>> >>> I am working on bisect today. I should have something >>> for you later this afternoon. >> >> Just FWIW I have it running here in KVM with a simplified config, so it >> might be something related to a specific feature or driver but not >> necessarily in the core itself. >> > > git bisect tells me it is > > Arnd Bergmann > remoteproc: avoid stack overflow in debugfs file > > This commit is also in 3.14.61-rc1 which worked just fine. > It is in 4.3.6-rc1 which does fail. > > I am building without it now to make sure it is the > offending commit > Sanity returns. Please remove the following commit: Ryan Ware EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons This commit can't stand on its own. crypto_memneq() isn't defined. With this change removed, it all works well. CC security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o^M security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function â<80><98>evm_verify_hmacâ<80><99>:^M security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error: implicit declaration of function â<80><98>crypto_memneqâ<80><99> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]^M rc = crypto_memneq(xattr_data->digest, calc.digest,^M ^^M cc1: some warnings being treated as errors^M make[3]: *** [security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o] Error 1^M make[2]: *** [security/integrity/evm] Error 2^M make[1]: *** [security/integrity] Error 2^M make: *** [security] Error 2^M I think I didn't run make clean and ended up with a bad install. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20160214222221.031471863@linuxfoundation.org> <56C20749.1010405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217203016.GA29946@kroah.com> <56C4D9DE.1090405@osg.samsung.com> <20160217232651.GB31125@1wt.eu> <56C50359.5040600@osg.samsung.com> Cc: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org From: Shuah Khan Message-ID: <56C5395B.9060002@osg.samsung.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 20:24:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C50359.5040600@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/17/2016 04:33 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 02/17/2016 04:26 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>> Compiled, but didn't boot on my test system. >>>>> Unfortunately, I won't be able to debug this >>>>> until Wednesday. >>>> >>>> Were you able to figure this out? >>>> >>> >>> I am working on bisect today. I should have something >>> for you later this afternoon. >> >> Just FWIW I have it running here in KVM with a simplified config, so it >> might be something related to a specific feature or driver but not >> necessarily in the core itself. >> > > git bisect tells me it is > > Arnd Bergmann > remoteproc: avoid stack overflow in debugfs file > > This commit is also in 3.14.61-rc1 which worked just fine. > It is in 4.3.6-rc1 which does fail. > > I am building without it now to make sure it is the > offending commit > Sanity returns. Please remove the following commit: Ryan Ware EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons This commit can't stand on its own. crypto_memneq() isn't defined. With this change removed, it all works well. CC security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o^M security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function �<80><98>evm_verify_hmac�<80><99>:^M security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error: implicit declaration of function �<80><98>crypto_memneq�<80><99> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]^M rc = crypto_memneq(xattr_data->digest, calc.digest,^M ^^M cc1: some warnings being treated as errors^M make[3]: *** [security/integrity/evm/evm_main.o] Error 1^M make[2]: *** [security/integrity/evm] Error 2^M make[1]: *** [security/integrity] Error 2^M make: *** [security] Error 2^M I think I didn't run make clean and ended up with a bad install. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978