From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: TX performance regression caused by the mbuf
 cachline split
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:31:32 +0100
Message-ID: <56C70B24.404@6wind.com>
References: <554FF482.9080103@net.in.tum.de> <55512DE5.7010800@net.in.tum.de>
 <555138C7.5010002@net.in.tum.de>
 <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772582142EB46@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <56C223CB.9080901@net.in.tum.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Paul Emmerich <emmericp@net.in.tum.de>,
 "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F4BC526
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:31:40 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <56C223CB.9080901@net.in.tum.de>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Paul,

On 02/15/2016 08:15 PM, Paul Emmerich wrote:
> The bulk_alloc patch is great and helps. I'd love to see such a function
> in DPDK.
> 

A patch has been submitted by Huawei. I guess it will be integrated
soon.
See http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10122/


Regards,
Olivier