From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:05 +0100
Message-ID: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com>
References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Thomas F Herbert <therbert@redhat.com>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D1C5E0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:27:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g62so104924561wme.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 04:27:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Thomas,

> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
> bad today?

can you check again?

For 2 download:

$ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938  dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz

tar tvzf is ok too.

Thanks for the notice,
   Vincent