From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41690)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1aX8kV-0008Sq-SV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:43:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mreitz@redhat.com>) id 1aX8kU-0005eX-VH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:43:07 -0500
References: <1455827853-33477-1-git-send-email-silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<1455827853-33477-3-git-send-email-silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56C87B73.8010607@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:42:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1455827853-33477-3-git-send-email-silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="9W8ggwf2M8CXIFkc4sklbAgmFw70dljjV"
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] qemu-iotests: 140: make description
 slightly more verbose
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Tu Bo <tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--9W8ggwf2M8CXIFkc4sklbAgmFw70dljjV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18.02.2016 21:37, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Describe in a little more detail what the test is supposed to achieve.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe <silbe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Max, does this reflect your intentions well enough? I took the liberty
> of re-using some of your review comments to extend the description.

Yes, it's fine, thanks.

Max


--9W8ggwf2M8CXIFkc4sklbAgmFw70dljjV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWyHtzAAoJEDuxQgLoOKytF6kIAI1jVLFCJbUFaVUyVvIwhTXZ
RoDvX7BpXW6XO3mbnRgcE2xLjd27pi+BBRNyfKFHdxldaCv4Fsta+oeVBHc0YigO
FBKPXz2QzM3wkahDFHXNd8JBFHE3jrpiP2l1px4cbrF+YyoT6Q3Yf4vghNiwfdGP
F5VS7kFTNVyDYIgOchkAHMbZdlA0d5DgaAvMdm4zebRz2dd/9mXdHrs+TWSGJuZd
jg4tOXma3JNaVlOxsFjSkwDBRVRioVLuA2DOS/0jOV4gkX7DmM1GnI2cFvxe6M2v
WbA0tsfObDDzo6lA72Bkc3ZusAcgXFk3kCcjt9JZu6Xn2YHf+KXX3vRvx2YQG20=
=moax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9W8ggwf2M8CXIFkc4sklbAgmFw70dljjV--