From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: add network namespace support for tc actions
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:36:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C8B21E.7070307@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455928994-9726-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
On 02/20/2016 01:43 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> Currently tc actions are stored in a per-module hashtable,
> therefore are visible to all network namespaces. This is
> probably the last part of the tc subsystem which is not
> aware of netns now. This patch makes them per-netns,
> several tc action API's need to be adjusted for this.
>
> The tc action API code is ugly due to historical reasons,
> we need to refactor that code in the future.
>
> Also this patch is on top of my other patch
> "net_sched: fix memory leaks when rmmod tc action modules",
> therefore should be applied after -net is merged into
> net-next.
>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/act_api.h | 28 +++++---
> net/sched/act_api.c | 88 ++++++++++-------------
> net/sched/act_bpf.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_connmark.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_csum.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_gact.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_ipt.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_nat.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_pedit.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_police.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_simple.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_skbedit.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++--
> net/sched/act_vlan.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++--
> 14 files changed, 969 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
Thanks for working on this!
Do you see a way to reduce the code duplication needed across all
the action modules? I.e. that each of them now needs to register
a new per netns subsystem, etc. In other words, is there a way the
action API could be reworked to handle most of this in the tc core
framework instead?
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-20 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-20 0:43 [Patch net-next] net_sched: add network namespace support for tc actions Cong Wang
2016-02-20 18:36 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2016-02-21 0:46 ` Cong Wang
2016-02-22 13:42 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2016-02-22 23:51 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C8B21E.7070307@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.