From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B462B770F9 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u1MCWIgS009625 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:32:18 +0100 Received: from [139.16.79.204] (MD1FZU9C.ww002.siemens.net [139.16.79.204]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1MCWIgC024846 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:32:18 +0100 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <56CAE338.7040002@mlbassoc.com> <56CAE68F.4000102@mlbassoc.com> From: Pascal Bach Message-ID: <56CAFFD2.6090304@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:32:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CAE68F.4000102@mlbassoc.com> Subject: Re: [meta-browser] ARM support in Chromium X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:32:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 22.02.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Gary Thomas: > On 2016-02-22 11:32, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Yes it can, because cortex-a7 is armv7a. > > My build failed listing the board as not compatible > ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'chromium' > ERROR: chromium was skipped: incompatible with machine teton-p0381 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE) I think it might be worth to have a look at your MACHINEOVERRIDES variable. bitbake -e should be of assistance here. > >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> >>> A recent change to the chromium recipe restricts it to only >>> armv6 and armv7a. I've built (and successfully run) previous >>> versions of chromium on my LS102x board which is cortexa7hf. >>> It's not clear to me what arm revision that works out to be >>> (where does one look for this info?) but I'd like to see if >>> chromium can still be used on my board? >>> >>> Thanks for any pointers >