From: "Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
To: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com, "Aníbal Limón" <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] oeqa/sdkext: Add sdk_update.SDKUpdateTest class.
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:26:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB36C3.2080609@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CB34E8.6060203@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3271 bytes --]
On 02/22/2016 10:18 AM, Randy Witt wrote:
> On 02/22/2016 07:03 AM, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>> From: Aníbal Limón <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
>>
>> The SDKUpdateTest class test devtool sdk-update mechanism inside
>> eSDK.
>>
>> The SDKUpdateTest class search for new sdk if not found uses
>> the main one then it publish the eSDK into known folder
>> inside work and it starts a web server for serve the eSDK.
>>
>> Finally it executes sdk-update over http, the local test is
>> commented due to bug [1].
>>
>> [1] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9043
>>
>> [YOCTO #9089]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón <limon.anibal@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py | 39
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..16f5b10
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/sdk_update.py
>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> +import os
>> +import shutil
>> +import subprocess
>> +
>> +from oeqa.oetest import oeSDKExtTest
>> +from oeqa.utils.httpserver import HTTPService
>> +
>> +class SdkUpdateTest(oeSDKExtTest):
>> +
>> + @classmethod
>> + def setUpClass(self):
>> + self.publish_dir = os.path.join(self.tc.sdktestdir,
>> 'esdk_publish')
>> + if os.path.exists(self.publish_dir):
>> + shutil.rmtree(self.publish_dir)
>> + os.mkdir(self.publish_dir)
>> +
>> + tcname_new = self.tc.d.expand(
>> + "${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAINEXT_OUTPUTNAME}-new.sh")
>> + if not os.path.exists(tcname_new):
>> + tcname_new = self.tc.tcname
>> +
>> + cmd = 'oe-publish-sdk %s %s' % (tcname_new, self.publish_dir)
>> + subprocess.check_output(cmd, shell=True)
>> +
>> + self.http_service = HTTPService(self.publish_dir)
>> + self.http_service.start()
>
> I think Paul and I briefly mentioned it, but SimpleHTTPServer fails as
> an sstate mirror if enough fetchers run. We think it was because of a
> limit on the number of simultaneous connections. So I would expect this
> to fail for instance if all packages were updated.
I tested running an update and didn't fail this implementation of
oeqa.utils open another process with multiprocessing for serve http only.
>
> But really we shouldn't care too much about the sstate updating part,
> and more about the layer updating etc. Ideally this test would check to
> make sure the local sdk now matches the remote.
I could add a test for the output that i saw displays "Already updated"
or what you mean about match?
>
>> + self.http_url = "http://127.0.0.1:%d" % self.http_service.port
>> +
>> + def test_sdk_update_http(self):
>> + output = self._run("devtool sdk-update \"%s\"" % self.http_url)
>> +
>> +# def test_sdk_update_local(self):
>> +# output = self._run("devtool sdk-update \"%s\"" %
>> self.publish_dir)
>> +
>> + @classmethod
>> + def tearDownClass(self):
>> + self.http_service.stop()
>> + shutil.rmtree(self.publish_dir)
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 15:03 [PATCH 0/4] Add extensible SDK update test Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] classes/testsdk: Move code for avoid PATHs to oeqa.utils Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] classes/testsdk: Move the removal of bitbake PATH to eSDK context only Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:54 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:09 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:23 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:37 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:48 ` Burton, Ross
2016-02-22 17:05 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 17:27 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 17:47 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 18:04 ` Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] classes/testsdk: Pass tcname to SDK and SDKExt contexts Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] oeqa/sdkext: Add sdk_update.SDKUpdateTest class Aníbal Limón
2016-02-22 16:18 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 16:26 ` Aníbal Limón [this message]
2016-02-22 16:36 ` Randy Witt
2016-02-22 17:10 ` Aníbal Limón
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CB36C3.2080609@linux.intel.com \
--to=anibal.limon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=limon.anibal@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.