All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@gmail.com>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:51:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB66DD.7060408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22215.19713.301670.428698@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On 02/19/2016 12:12 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd"):
>> On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 12:05 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>> It has four instances of the same CID 1198719 (strncpy(..., 32) into a
>>>> 32-byte buffer).
>>>>
>>>> However ever since it was checked in in 2008 it has contained a
>>>> /tmp instead of the real ones in /proc. I therefore conclude that it
>>>> has not ever been used in its current form in the last 8 years and
>>>> might as well therefore be deleted. The code remains in the git
>>>> history should anyone one to reanimate it.
>>>>
>>>> Searching online shows no references to the use of this tool.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>>
>>> .. Can I commit this in now :-)
>>
>> I think formally it probably needs an Ack from Wei or Ian?
> 
> I think it probably does, and:
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
> 
> But:
> 
>> I usually give this sort of thing (removals etc) a little longer than
>> normal to give more of a chance for objections, although the counter to
>> that is that once this is committed it could just as easily be reverted the
>> next day as in 6 months time if someone turns up with a good reason it
>> shouldn't have been nuked.
> 
> Deleting it right away seems a bit rude.  Maybe someone is using it
> with the #define sorted out.  So if nothing intervenes I guess we
> should commit this late next week ?
> 
> Ian.

I was around when this was first created. It requires bits in QEMU to
make it work which I don't think were ever upstreamed. It is also tied
to one of the ACPI SSDTs. If you are removing it you may need to look
into that module too:

tools/firmware/hvmloader/acpi/ssdt_pm.asl

I am not weighing in one whether or not to remove it, just giving some
supplemental info...

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 


-- 
Ross Philipson

      reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17 14:41 [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd Ian Campbell
2016-02-17 17:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-18 10:20   ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-19 17:12     ` Ian Jackson
2016-02-22 19:51       ` Ross Philipson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CB66DD.7060408@gmail.com \
    --to=ross.philipson@gmail.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.