From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/xsaves: Fix init_fpstate.header.xcomp_bv
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:55:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB67C6.3050707@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456167596-3932-1-git-send-email-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
On 02/22/2016 10:59 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> This actually does not apply to XSAVES as XSAVES uses optimization. After
> init, all components are in INIT and not MODIFIED state and will not be
> saved. There is no need of setting xcomp_bv except for bit 63 to indicate
> a compacted format.
I look at it this way: xcomp_bv tells you the format of the buffer
xstate_bv tells you which components of the buffer are valid (not in
init state).
As it stands, every kernel xcomp_bv value should be identical, since the
kernel buffer is always in the same state and XSAVES is always called
with the same Requested Feature BitMap (RFBM).
While I don't think this patch _hurts_ anything, I think it might be a
bit confusing. Wouldn't it just be easier if *EVERY* xcomp_bv value was
the same?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-22 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 18:59 [PATCH 07/10] x86/xsaves: Fix init_fpstate.header.xcomp_bv Yu-cheng Yu
2016-02-22 19:55 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-02-22 20:42 ` Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CB67C6.3050707@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.