From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 To: Michael Turquette , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org References: <1455603632-11158-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1455603632-11158-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <56C44578.5010009@samsung.com> <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io> Cc: Kukjin Kim , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Stephen Boyd , Tomasz Figa , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , Alim Akhtar , Pankaj Dubey , Chanwoo Choi From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-id: <56CBA45E.9070105@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:14:22 +0900 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 23.02.2016 03:26, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36) >> On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS >>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit. >>> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like >>> multi_v7 for ARMv7). >>> >>> Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> > > Thanks for the Ack. > > I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed > the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the > clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot. > clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for > arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next. Thanks, pulled! Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:14:22 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7 In-Reply-To: <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io> References: <1455603632-11158-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1455603632-11158-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <56C44578.5010009@samsung.com> <20160222182656.2278.68402@quark.deferred.io> Message-ID: <56CBA45E.9070105@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 23.02.2016 03:26, Michael Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2016-02-17 02:03:36) >> On 16/02/16 07:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS >>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit. >>> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like >>> multi_v7 for ARMv7). >>> >>> Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> > > Thanks for the Ack. > > I've rebased patches #1 and #2 against James's b9e65ebc654d and pushed > the clk-samsung branch to the clk tree. I have deleted the > clk-samsung-kconfig branch that was blowing up the kbuild robot. > clk-samsung will not be rebased and can be used as a dependency for > arm-soc. It has been merged into clk-next. Thanks, pulled! Best regards, Krzysztof