From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, philip.li@intel.com,
julie.du@intel.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option to record base tree info
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:23:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CC2507.7060300@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160223091740.GA3830@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
On 02/23/16 01:17, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> However we are facing a new situation: in test robot POV, IMHO there
> are values to test exactly the same tree as the patch submitter.
> Otherwise the robot risks
>
> - false negative: failing to apply and test some patches
> - false positive: sending wrong bug reports due to guessed wrong base tree
>
Wouldn't the important part here be the git hash, rather than the tree?
If you have the same hash then it by definition is the same contents?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-22 2:58 [RFC/PATCH 0/1] Add an option to git-format-patch to record base tree info Xiaolong Ye
2016-02-22 2:58 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/1] format-patch: add an option " Xiaolong Ye
2016-02-22 4:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-22 7:30 ` Jacob Keller
2016-02-23 1:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-23 6:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23 9:17 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-23 9:23 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2016-02-23 9:32 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-23 10:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-23 12:00 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-23 13:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-02-24 2:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-24 6:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-24 7:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-24 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23 19:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-02-23 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-23 20:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-02-23 21:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-02-24 1:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-02-23 22:21 ` Stefan Beller
2016-02-24 10:31 ` Michael J Gruber
2016-02-24 6:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-24 3:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-24 3:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-02-23 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-02-24 2:30 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CC2507.7060300@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=julie.du@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.