From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 1/2] net_sched: prepare tcf_hashinfo_destroy() for netns support Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:01:36 -0500 Message-ID: <56CC5830.6040308@mojatatu.com> References: <1456185473-25403-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> <1456185473-25403-2-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Cong Wang , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:34496 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbcBWNBi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:01:38 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id g6so110583156igt.1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:01:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1456185473-25403-2-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16-02-22 06:57 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > We only release the memory of the hashtable itself, not its > entries inside. This is not a problem yet since we only call > it in module release path, and module is refcount'ed by > actions. This would be a problem after we move the per module > hinfo into per netns in the latter patch. > > Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim cheers, jamal