All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block: Allow x-blockdev-del on a BB with a monitor-owned BDS
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:15:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CDD70F.8000304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87083486787f4d4b9752f4b29209e6d0d1d31626.1455033112.git.berto@igalia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1936 bytes --]

On 09.02.2016 16:57, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> When x-blockdev-del is performed on a BlockBackend that has inserted
> media it will only succeed if the BDS doesn't have any additional
> references.
> 
> The only problem with this is that if the BDS was created separately
> using blockdev-add then the backend won't be able to be destroyed
> unless the BDS is ejected first. This is an unnecessary restriction.

Is it? In order to get into this situation, you need to execute:
blockdev-add (BB/BDS), blockdev-add (BDS/BB), x-blockdev-insert-medium

Now, in order to unravel it, you currently need:
x-blockdev-remove-medium (or eject), x-blockdev-del (BB/BDS),
x-blockdev-del (BDS/BB)

So you need to execute the x-blockdev-remove-medium because you did an
x-blockdev-insert-medium before. That seems reasonable to me, and not
very superfluous.

In fact, the behavior allowed by this patch appears a bit inconsistent
to me. Why is it OK for x-blockdev-del to automatically eject a BDS from
a BB if the BB is deleted, but not if the BDS is deleted? (which is what
your modifications to test 139 verify)

> Now that we have a list of monitor-owned BDSs we can allow
> x-blockdev-del to work in this scenario if the BDS has exactly one
> extra reference and that reference is from the monitor.
> 
> This patch also updates iotest 139 to reflect this change. Both
> testAttachMedia() and testSnapshot() are split in two: one version
> keeps the previous behavior, and a second version checks that the new
> functionality works as expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
> ---
>  blockdev.c                 | 13 ++++++++++---
>  tests/qemu-iotests/139     | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  tests/qemu-iotests/139.out |  4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

The patch itself looks fine to me, but I'm not so sure about the idea
behind it.

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-24 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-09 15:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow x-blockdev-del on a BB with a monitor-owned BDS Alberto Garcia
2016-02-09 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block: " Alberto Garcia
2016-02-24 16:15   ` Max Reitz [this message]
2016-02-25 11:11     ` Alberto Garcia
2016-02-26  8:58       ` Kevin Wolf
2016-02-26  9:09         ` Alberto Garcia
2016-02-09 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: Update the x-blockdev-del documentation Alberto Garcia
2016-02-24 12:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Allow x-blockdev-del on a BB with a monitor-owned BDS Alberto Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CDD70F.8000304@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.