From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from starfish.geekisp.com (starfish.geekisp.com [216.168.135.166]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C62A2772FE for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20364 invoked by uid 1003); 24 Feb 2016 16:35:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.11.140?) (philip@opensdr.com@71.171.13.83) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Feb 2016 16:35:26 -0000 To: Trevor Woerner , Joshua Lock , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <56CDD519.9050109@gmail.com> From: Philip Balister Message-ID: <56CDDBCD.6090303@balister.org> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:35:25 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CDD519.9050109@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Integrate swupd software updater X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:35:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/24/2016 11:06 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Ideally the work done here and the work done on meta-swupdate[1] would > be somehow merged so people creating images/distros would only have to > learn and integrate one software update solution, instead of having to > evaluate and choose between the two (or more?). > > > [1] https://github.com/sbabic/meta-swupdate Amen. I had the same thoughts reading the patch set intro. Maybe the swupd should go in a seperate layer so we can see which project works best for oe users before moving something directly into oe-core? Philip