* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
@ 2016-02-25 8:40 ` Thomas Huth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Huth @ 2016-02-25 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: quintela, KVM devel mailing list, QEMU Developer
Cc: pkrempa, Eduardo Habkost, Bharata B Rao, Igor Mammedov,
David Gibson, Andreas Färber
On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
>
> At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
2016-02-25 8:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
@ 2016-02-25 12:47 ` Peter Krempa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Krempa @ 2016-02-25 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth
Cc: quintela, KVM devel mailing list, QEMU Developer,
Andreas Färber, Eduardo Habkost, David Gibson, Bharata B Rao,
Igor Mammedov
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:40:34 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> >
> > At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> > cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
I'll gladly join for the libvirt part if the agenda will include this.
Peter
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
@ 2016-02-25 12:47 ` Peter Krempa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Krempa @ 2016-02-25 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth
Cc: Eduardo Habkost, KVM devel mailing list, quintela, QEMU Developer,
Igor Mammedov, Bharata B Rao, David Gibson, Andreas Färber
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:40:34 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> >
> > At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> > cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
I'll gladly join for the libvirt part if the agenda will include this.
Peter
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
2016-02-25 8:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
@ 2016-02-25 17:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2016-02-25 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth
Cc: quintela, KVM devel mailing list, QEMU Developer,
Andreas Färber, David Gibson, Bharata B Rao, Igor Mammedov,
pkrempa
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:40:34AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> >
> > At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> > cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
Yes, please. This time I will be able to join.
--
Eduardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
@ 2016-02-25 17:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2016-02-25 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth
Cc: pkrempa, KVM devel mailing list, quintela, QEMU Developer,
Igor Mammedov, Bharata B Rao, David Gibson, Andreas Färber
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:40:34AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> >
> > At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> > cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
Yes, please. This time I will be able to join.
--
Eduardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
2016-02-25 8:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
@ 2016-03-01 13:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2016-03-01 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, quintela, KVM devel mailing list, QEMU Developer
Cc: pkrempa, Eduardo Habkost, Bharata B Rao, Igor Mammedov,
David Gibson, Andreas Färber
On 02/25/2016 09:40 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
>>
>> At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
>> cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
>
> Thomas
Hmpf. I have seen this too late. Can you cc some s390 folks the next time?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
@ 2016-03-01 13:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2016-03-01 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Huth, quintela, KVM devel mailing list, QEMU Developer
Cc: pkrempa, Eduardo Habkost, Bharata B Rao, David Gibson,
Igor Mammedov, Andreas Färber
On 02/25/2016 09:40 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
>>
>> At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
>> cancellation of the call, so hurry up.
>
> Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
> going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
> common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...
>
> Thomas
Hmpf. I have seen this too late. Can you cc some s390 folks the next time?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread