From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A1D51E00C97; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:44:05 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487F1E00C87 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y8so13575627igp.1 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:44:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ehf89alAAuIgSm9GrVMHRSGDG+PC2rT/ao04dvpWcxM=; b=Q1xWTGMbCaZkLJ/zr+KPBOMO/EF3Fl2JE8KanTL89dJ2ScdxHiewip8E2R4BilyCjB Zkt57nq8pBNtEU6KxUtabnB3X7uXU3nO9PUJICs8vhXbPLw0mJBqdtMfvhKDRactqHrE yaOV6FqxnaIBGxT9DDfHomHDW6xm5RPUoHhvrYJyaZbpO2BNjgb5GkEFjau8M+jMeR1k cAhAuM9NrypOjdF6g7lzqlhiP1+q+Ms+sPI8M4j+zYaQH179YuhMNzzTNc/PllWbS9uf 0dx9WBHUXbBo60e1BWp80lXU1LYUAMAaByDqDggf5n428LqyD5Hsrj3fTmuM6u8qjkuv 6Yxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ehf89alAAuIgSm9GrVMHRSGDG+PC2rT/ao04dvpWcxM=; b=gp7/yD59FDzO2n4XZoxuAza362/cjhq/wkrj5j2A1M4udkoZoonIe0Yy6/Ds4Rjo+Z hclzWGnQsU99J9ewgXD4+jp15u1+NJbRqvDdWoymfbA63e7niR/fe/I14fEsii+vZo13 kAarSbOfx17OjGfYJazXVAwCUIR3vkp1izEL5ldk4ftDU0wFirNZgPjvJd56Cixk2oUb OqKgDroySts60zK2IuD9btBZuGwk3hjCXMixEbEMqLLVDQ9pzR2aZG4NfXVDXHV01Dmc pHdavMcukcSPlTdCeckghHccdlNRIyjuwa+9zE4MaI/6lWgrqLY6dBaGmJZPbqFZWZOY QDag== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS4RPRmxf73hJcQ2N8KipOm+IbrjOjhMtpSvHYUJiyBh69aiUDT5o1UIW7H4xYZ1Q== X-Received: by 10.50.50.201 with SMTP id e9mr3318252igo.10.1456407841006; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o201sm3238195ioe.15.2016.02.25.05.43.59 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:44:00 -0800 (PST) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <1454173548-5806-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20160223210251.GC10598@ad.chargestorm.se> <20160224202824.GA5109@ad.chargestorm.se> From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <56CF0527.1080909@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:44:07 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160224202824.GA5109@ad.chargestorm.se> Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] linux-raspberrypi: Adjust for libexecdir changes X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 13:44:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/24/16 15:28, Anders Darander wrote: > If the rest of the patches in that series is non-controversial, could we > have them applied? Otherwise, could we have Khem's patch applied, and > the other series rebased upon that? > > We've had the master branch non-building for quite a while now... > > I'm just keen to get either of those patches applied to > meta-raspberrypi. I'd like to avoid having to use a local fork as much > as possible... +1