diff for duplicates of <56CF0E6B.5020903@synopsys.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index d341cc1..81057dc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Thursday 25 February 2016 07:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: -> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:21:25AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: +> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016@10:21:25AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote: >>>> What I actually meant was is it OK for irq_work_queue_on() to be called locally >>>> (is this a sched bug/optimization(. Further if it is OK to be called, does it need >>>> to do behave more like irq_work_queue() i.e. call arch_irq_work_raise() or @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ On Thursday 25 February 2016 07:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> Right, so I'm not actually sure we started out with this requirement. >>> But you're not the first to run into this, see: >>> ->>> lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0gLankSuziQq25qTCyNqeOX43yD9jnJu_XXwbdyajfmKg@mail.gmail.com +>>> lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0gLankSuziQq25qTCyNqeOX43yD9jnJu_XXwbdyajfmKg at mail.gmail.com >>> >>> Initially I think irq_work_queue_on() was only used remotely, but I >>> think it makes sense to allow the current cpu, esp. since people seem to diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 9583f0f..9a78e6d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,22 +3,14 @@ "ref\020160223095824.GH6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net\0" "ref\056CD36CD.2080303@synopsys.com\0" "ref\020160225140654.GL6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net\0" - "From\0Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: Interesting csd deadlock on ARC\0" + "From\0Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)\0" + "Subject\0Interesting csd deadlock on ARC\0" "Date\0Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:53:39 +0530\0" - "To\0Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>" - " Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>\0" - "Cc\0linux-arch@vger.kernel.org <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>" - Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> - " arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>\0" + "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thursday 25 February 2016 07:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:\n" - "> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:21:25AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:\n" + "> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016@10:21:25AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:\n" ">>>> What I actually meant was is it OK for irq_work_queue_on() to be called locally\n" ">>>> (is this a sched bug/optimization(. Further if it is OK to be called, does it need\n" ">>>> to do behave more like irq_work_queue() i.e. call arch_irq_work_raise() or\n" @@ -27,7 +19,7 @@ ">>> Right, so I'm not actually sure we started out with this requirement.\n" ">>> But you're not the first to run into this, see:\n" ">>>\n" - ">>> lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0gLankSuziQq25qTCyNqeOX43yD9jnJu_XXwbdyajfmKg@mail.gmail.com\n" + ">>> lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0gLankSuziQq25qTCyNqeOX43yD9jnJu_XXwbdyajfmKg at mail.gmail.com\n" ">>>\n" ">>> Initially I think irq_work_queue_on() was only used remotely, but I\n" ">>> think it makes sense to allow the current cpu, esp. since people seem to\n" @@ -54,4 +46,4 @@ "\n" This would be a cleaner solution IMHO ! -a1f75bdf1da7b18f165c86217955bfef1274938fc1f4fc907eb626d0d5e16722 +d026a4c7f523b066c53de887c29024248ee93c1a074432df6eac9ac53345eedd
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.