From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:27:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CF398A.8020905@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160225164729.GS6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/25/16 8:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:58:57PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> +static inline int perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip)
>> {
>> + if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
>> entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip;
>> + return 0;
>> + } else {
>> + return -1; /* no more room, stop walking the stack */
>> + }
>> }
>
> Why 0 and -1 ?
because that's the interface you had for callbacks in
'struct stacktrace_ops' including a comment there:
/* On negative return stop dumping */
> What's wrong with something like:
>
> static inline bool perf_callchain_store(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, u64 ip)
> {
> if (entry->nr < PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
> entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip;
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> }
I would prefer something like this as well, but it would look
inconsistent with what is already there. To make it bool
one would need to change struct stacktrace_ops for all archs
and touch a lot of files all over the tree.
Way more than 51 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) as this patch did
for no real gain.
It's better to be consistent with existing code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-25 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-18 3:58 [PATCH net-next 0/3] bpf_get_stackid() and stack_trace map Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] perf: generalize perf_callchain Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 17:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-25 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-18 3:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] samples/bpf: offwaketime example Alexei Starovoitov
2016-02-20 5:25 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] bpf_get_stackid() and stack_trace map David Miller
2016-02-25 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 16:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CF398A.8020905@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.