From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: Strange AVC with latest rawhide kernel. To: Paul Moore , Daniel J Walsh References: <1456423369.3702.42.camel@redhat.com> <56CF4574.3030709@tycho.nsa.gov> <1456426779.3702.52.camel@redhat.com> <56CF523A.7000503@tycho.nsa.gov> <1456429021.31341.34.camel@redhat.com> <56CF5A54.7020600@tycho.nsa.gov> <1456432101.3702.67.camel@redhat.com> <56CF6A08.6010305@tycho.nsa.gov> <1456491264.3481.2.camel@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Paris , Paul Moore , mgrepl@redhat.com, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov From: Stephen Smalley Message-ID: <56D07421.3090301@tycho.nsa.gov> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:49:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-Id: "Security-Enhanced Linux \(SELinux\) mailing list" List-Post: List-Help: On 02/26/2016 10:46 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 15:54 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: >>> On 02/25/2016 03:28 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> Currently typebounds only allows one instance. >>> It is a hierarchy, where each child has a single parent. So you can >>> define hierarchies like: >>> typebounds unconfined_t docker_t; >>> typebounds docker_t svirt_lxc_net_t; >>> and then they can both transition because they are both ancestors. >> >> Awesome idea. > > Would that resolve all your problems Dan with Docker, runc, etc.? >>>From our discussions the other day I thought you needed the ability to > transition to svirt_lxc_net_t from domains other than unconfined_t and > docker_t ... or was I misunderstanding you? > Note that it is only exec-based transitions that are affected by NO_NEW_PRIVS, so one can always leverage dynamic transitions (i.e. setcon) without requiring typebounds.