From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423020AbcBZSVm (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:21:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:36901 "EHLO mail-wm0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422711AbcBZSVi (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:21:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] LightNVM patches for 4.5-rc To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@fb.com References: <1455954763-7880-1-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> From: Matias Bjorling Message-ID: <56D097AF.2010505@bjorling.me> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:21:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1455954763-7880-1-git-send-email-m@bjorling.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/20/2016 08:52 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Sorry, I was living in a fairy tail land, where patches are > miraculously applied without being sent upstream. Leading me to test > on top of the wrong base. > > I was missing three patches, which I should have sent for previous -rc > round. > > The first patch fixes taking a normal spinlock in interrupt context. > Second and third are cleanups, and at last the patch that previously > did not compile. > > Thanks, > Matias > > Javier González (2): > lightnvm: update closed list outside of intr context > lightnvm: generalize rrpc ppa calculations > > Matias Bjørling (2): > lightnvm: rename ->nr_pages to ->nr_sects > lightnvm: remove struct nvm_dev->total_blocks > > drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 6 +-- > drivers/lightnvm/gennvm.c | 7 ++-- > drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > drivers/lightnvm/rrpc.h | 15 ++++++-- > include/linux/lightnvm.h | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > Hi Jens, Please consider to apply these for the next -rc. If only part of them, then just the first path, as it fixes a problem when blocks are closed during a write. Thanks, Matias