From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: tegra: correct Beaver pinmux Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:28:08 -0700 Message-ID: <56D0A748.6060104@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1456514310-27605-1-git-send-email-dev@lynxeye.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1456514310-27605-1-git-send-email-dev-8ppwABl0HbeELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lucas Stach Cc: Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ARM kernel mailing list List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 02/26/2016 12:18 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Update pinmux to get rid of invalid uses of the rsvd1 function, which lead > to the mux settings on those pins to not be applied. > > Also add correct drive settings, derived from the Tegra3 TRM, for SDIO1, > which makes some more SD-cards work. I replied the following to V1, which I don't see resolved: > I think it would be worth mentioning in the commit description where > this[1] data came from. [1] that was in response to the addition of the sdio1 drive settings. Also, what is different in V2; is this actually V1 REPOST? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:28:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: tegra: correct Beaver pinmux In-Reply-To: <1456514310-27605-1-git-send-email-dev@lynxeye.de> References: <1456514310-27605-1-git-send-email-dev@lynxeye.de> Message-ID: <56D0A748.6060104@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/26/2016 12:18 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Update pinmux to get rid of invalid uses of the rsvd1 function, which lead > to the mux settings on those pins to not be applied. > > Also add correct drive settings, derived from the Tegra3 TRM, for SDIO1, > which makes some more SD-cards work. I replied the following to V1, which I don't see resolved: > I think it would be worth mentioning in the commit description where > this[1] data came from. [1] that was in response to the addition of the sdio1 drive settings. Also, what is different in V2; is this actually V1 REPOST?