From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:53746 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754786AbcBZTnq (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:43:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add dt nodes for PWMSS To: Tony Lindgren References: <1456439796-28546-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1456439796-28546-6-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> CC: , , , , , , , , From: Franklin S Cooper Jr Message-ID: <56D0AAD2.7060003@ti.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:43:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Tony On 02/26/2016 01:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Franklin S Cooper Jr [160225 14:37]: >> From: Vignesh R >> >> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation >> for dt bindings. > > Are the dts changes safe to pick separately? I'm mostly worried > about clock related hangs unless the clock changes are merged > first. > > Regards, > > Tony > I just did a boot test where I only had this patch applied and the dra7 board booted successfully. Of course I assume there will be problems if someone actually tried to enable EPWM or ECAP without the other clock patches. Bootlog: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15208985/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Franklin S Cooper Jr Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add dt nodes for PWMSS Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:43:14 -0600 Message-ID: <56D0AAD2.7060003@ti.com> References: <1456439796-28546-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1456439796-28546-6-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: paul@pwsan.com, t-kristo@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony On 02/26/2016 01:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Franklin S Cooper Jr [160225 14:37]: >> From: Vignesh R >> >> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation >> for dt bindings. > > Are the dts changes safe to pick separately? I'm mostly worried > about clock related hangs unless the clock changes are merged > first. > > Regards, > > Tony > I just did a boot test where I only had this patch applied and the dra7 board booted successfully. Of course I assume there will be problems if someone actually tried to enable EPWM or ECAP without the other clock patches. Bootlog: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15208985/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: fcooper@ti.com (Franklin S Cooper Jr) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:43:14 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add dt nodes for PWMSS In-Reply-To: <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> References: <1456439796-28546-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1456439796-28546-6-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <20160226191848.GJ13417@atomide.com> Message-ID: <56D0AAD2.7060003@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Tony On 02/26/2016 01:18 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Franklin S Cooper Jr [160225 14:37]: >> From: Vignesh R >> >> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation >> for dt bindings. > > Are the dts changes safe to pick separately? I'm mostly worried > about clock related hangs unless the clock changes are merged > first. > > Regards, > > Tony > I just did a boot test where I only had this patch applied and the dra7 board booted successfully. Of course I assume there will be problems if someone actually tried to enable EPWM or ECAP without the other clock patches. Bootlog: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/15208985/