From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sardaukai Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:59:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Missing Code v4.5-rc1 [Patch v3 25/25] IT8628E Message-Id: <56D3277B.8020006@gmx.de> List-Id: References: <56D1B0EF.9050603@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <56D1B0EF.9050603@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Small Update > ... >> In addition i searched drivers/hwmon/it87.c in order to find the=20 >> patched code from kernel 4.5-rc5. >> Unfortunately i found no code changes from Patch v3 (i tested about 5=20 >> patches). >> Should it not be patched within 4.5-rc1 or do i miss here something? >> > Does it say anywhere that the patches were reviewed and/or accepted > for upstream integration ? > > Problem is that there is hardly anyone willing to review hwmon kernel > patches nowadays, meaning they have to go in unreviewed or not at all. > Given the complexity and scope of the series, I don't want to just push > the patches into the upstream kernel without review. With that in mind, > it may take a while for the code to be upstream. > I see. You wrote that it should go up with rc-1, so i thought it is=20 already there, my mistake. >> Second question >> Is it possible to take your code from github to patch/replace it in=20 >> another kernel, like 4.3 / 4.4 ? >> > Yes, that should be possible. I have been running it on earlier kernels > myself. With GitHub module code for it87 chip's and a boot parameter=20 "acpi_enforce_resources=3Dlax" i was able to load it. it8628-isa-0a40 Adapter: ISA adapter in0: +0.43 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) <--- seems = to be VCore, tested with cpuBurn in1: +2.04 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) in2: +2.00 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) in3: +2.04 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) in4: +0.01 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) in5: +1.07 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) in6: +1.20 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +3.06 V) <--- could = be RAM Voltage 3VSB: +3.36 V (min =3D +0.00 V, max =3D +6.12 V) Vbat: +3.17 V <--- Battery Voltage from EFI, really?! fan1: 0 RPM (min =3D 0 RPM) <--- CPU_FAN not connected fan2: 2280 RPM (min =3D 0 RPM) <--- CPU_OPT (my H80i pump) fan3: 1078 RPM (min =3D 0 RPM) <--- SYS_FAN3 or 2 (radiator fan) fan4: 0 RPM (min =3D 0 RPM) <--- SYS_FAN1 not connected fan5: 1819 RPM (min =3D 0 RPM) <--- SYS_FAN2 or 3 (radiator fan = #2) temp1: +43.0=B0C (low =3D +127.0=B0C, high =3D +127.0=B0C) sensor= =3D=20 thermistor temp2: -8.0=B0C (low =3D +127.0=B0C, high =3D +127.0=B0C) sensor= =3D=20 thermistor temp3: +22.0=B0C (low =3D +127.0=B0C, high =3D +127.0=B0C) sensor= =3D=20 Intel PECI intrusion0: OK <--- Nice, i have to check where and how=20 to use that Kernel 4.3.5 with Debian Testing (Stretch) sensors version 3.4.0 with libsensors version 3.4.0 fancontrol 3.4.0-2 I'll try to get that names step by step. Further i tried fancontrol, i=20 got funny stuff with fan5. It seems to be that PWM values from fan5 are inverted. Following fancontrol setting stops all fans. # Configuration file generated by pwmconfig, changes will be lost INTERVAL=3D10 DEVPATH=3Dhwmon2=3Ddevices/platform/it87.2624 DEVNAME=3Dhwmon2=3Dit8628 FCTEMPS=3Dhwmon2/pwm5=3Dhwmon2/temp3_input hwmon2/pwm3=3Dhwmon2/temp3_input FCFANS=3Dhwmon2/pwm5=3Dhwmon2/fan5_input hwmon2/pwm3=3Dhwmon2/fan3_input MINTEMP=3Dhwmon2/pwm5=3D20 hwmon2/pwm3=3D20 MAXTEMP=3Dhwmon2/pwm5=3D60 hwmon2/pwm3=3D60 MINSTOP=3Dhwmon2/pwm3=3D1 hwmon2/pwm5=3D254 MINSTART=3Dhwmon2/pwm3=3D1 hwmon2/pwm5=3D255 MINPWM=3Dhwmon2/pwm3=3D0 hwmon2/pwm5=3D254 MAXPWM=3Dhwmon2/pwm3=3D2 hwmon2/pwm5=3D255 I tried some different EFI settings with system fans (Silent, Normal,=20 PWM per degree) without any changes. Fan3 works out of the box. I will check all other fans soon. Any idea how to fix that? Uwe _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors