Re: [PATCH V6 05/10] Documentation: DT: bindings: Add power domain info for NVIDIA PMC

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On 29/02/16 11:01, Thierry Reding wrote:

[snip]

> I've always considered per-SoC invariant data to not belong into
> bindings. That is, constants such as power partition IDs or SMMU client
> IDs should be defined via tables in drivers, and DT should be used to
> hook them up to devices.
> 
> Defining the existing power domains in DT seems rather brittle to me. A
> compatible string would imply the set of supported power domains anyway
> and having that set specified in DT would technically require us to add
> code in the driver to validate that the DT is sane, which would entail
> the addition of a very similar table anyway.
> 
> One further reason why I prefer not to have these things specified (as
> opposed to "glued" together) in DT is that the DT is ABI, so if we ever
> happen to ship a broken DT we won't be able to easily fix it. Driver
> code, on the other hand, can always easily be fixed.

Yes, I guess that is consistent with other Tegra drivers too. Ok, I will
drop the reg property and just use the name.

Cheers
Jon