All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Adding target device caused an alignment inconsistency
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:41:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D6A757.5020706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D6290D.1080906@sandisk.com>

Dne 2.3.2016 v 00:43 Bart Van Assche napsal(a):
> On 03/01/2016 02:25 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> With kernel 4.4.0 (openSuSE Tumbleweed) I see the following message
>> appear systematically in the kernel log if udev reports a new path to
>> multipathd:
>>
>> [958779.753012] device-mapper: table: 254:0: adding target device sdg
>> caused an alignment inconsistency: physical_block_size=4096,
>> logical_block_size=512, alignment_offset=0, start=0
>>
>> This did not happen with previous kernel versions. This causes the
>> initiator to report the new paths as faulty until I run the following
>> command:
>>
>> echo reconfigure | multipathd -k
>>
>> Is this a know issue?
>
> (replying to my own e-mail)
>
> After having run multipath -f + another reconfigure I noticed that the
> optimal_io_size parameter for multipath devices is zero (io_opt) but that
> blk_stack_limits() expects that that parameter is not zero. So i tried to
> repeat the test described in commit e9637415a92cf25ad800b7fdeddcd30cce7b44ab:
>
> # modprobe scsi_debug dev_size_mb=10 num_tgts=1 opt_blks=1536
> # lsscsi | grep debug
> [17352:0:0:0]disk    Linux    scsi_debug       0184  /dev/sds
> # cat /sys/block/sds/queue/optimal_io_size
> 1536
> # dmsetup create node --table "0 100 linear /dev/sds 0"
> (hangs in the semop() system call)
> ^C
>


It's known  there was a broken  patch in  4.5-rc0-rc4
which mistakenly used  'sector' units instead of bytes of
optimal_io_size.

So it seems someone has backported this broken patch without the fixing part 
to the stable 4.4 kernel.

Zdenek

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-02  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01 22:25 Adding target device caused an alignment inconsistency Bart Van Assche
2016-03-01 23:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-03-02  0:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2016-03-02  8:41   ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D6A757.5020706@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.