From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Ricky Liang <jcliang@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv7 PATCH 03/10] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:50:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D7B46B.9070508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0h7HeQYgx91Z4EQLrWh=xa+NP9zunMUvBy6XLt-863n_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/02/2016 06:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm not actually sure if RT is the right answer here. DL may be a
> better choice. After all, we want the thing to happen shortly, but
> not necessarily at full speed.
>
> So something like a DL workqueue would be quite useful here it seems.
The DL idea seems like a good one to me.
It would also prevent cpufreq changes from being delayed by other RT or
DL tasks.
thanks,
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 1:22 [RFCv7 PATCH 00/10] sched: scheduler-driven CPU frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 01/10] sched: Compute cpu capacity available at current frequency Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-23 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-26 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_driver_is_slow Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 0:50 ` Michael Turquette
2016-02-26 0:50 ` Michael Turquette
2016-02-26 1:07 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-26 1:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20160226185503.2278.20479@quark.deferred.io>
2016-02-26 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 03/10] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-02-25 3:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-27 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 19:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 0:34 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-27 2:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-27 4:17 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-28 2:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 7:49 ` Michael Turquette
2016-03-03 2:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-03 3:50 ` Steve Muckle [this message]
2016-03-03 9:34 ` Juri Lelli
2016-03-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-03 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: add triggers for OPP change requests Steve Muckle
2016-03-01 6:51 ` Ricky Liang
2016-03-03 3:55 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 05/10] sched/{core,fair}: trigger OPP change request on fork() Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: cpufreq_sched triggers for load balancing Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: jump to max OPP when crossing UP threshold Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 08/10] sched: remove call of sched_avg_update from sched_rt_avg_update Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 09/10] sched/deadline: split rt_avg in 2 distincts metrics Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 10/10] sched: rt scheduler sets capacity requirement Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:33 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 00/10] sched: scheduler-driven CPU frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-03-30 0:45 ` Yuyang Du
2016-03-31 1:35 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-30 20:22 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D7B46B.9070508@linaro.org \
--to=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jcliang@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.