From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
cov@codeaurora.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, lenb@kernel.org, harish.k@hpe.com,
ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:12:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D8546B.5040908@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160303151048.GA3290@localhost>
On 3/3/2016 10:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> That was my idea, but your minimal patch from last night looks awfully
> attractive, and maybe it's not worth moving it to arch/x86. I do think we
> could simplify the code significantly by getting rid of the kzalloc and
> acpi_irq_penalty_list from acpi_irq_set_penalty(). How about pushing on
> that a little bit first, and see what it looks like then?
OK. Let me go that direction.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-18 13:19 [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment Sinan Kaya
2016-02-18 15:12 ` Timur Tabi
2016-02-18 16:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-18 16:43 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-02-29 19:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-02-29 20:08 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-02-29 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-01 18:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-01 19:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-02 18:31 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-03 3:14 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-03 14:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-03 15:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-03 15:12 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-03-03 17:29 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-04 18:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-07 16:55 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 0:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-08 0:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-08 19:04 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-09 0:45 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 8:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-03-08 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D8546B.5040908@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=harish.k@hpe.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.