On 3/3/2016 10:12 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 3/3/2016 10:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> That was my idea, but your minimal patch from last night looks awfully
>> attractive, and maybe it's not worth moving it to arch/x86.  I do think we
>> could simplify the code significantly by getting rid of the kzalloc and
>> acpi_irq_penalty_list from acpi_irq_set_penalty().  How about pushing on
>> that a little bit first, and see what it looks like then?
> 
> OK. Let me go that direction.
> 

How about this?

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project