From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Stray 4k extents with slow buffered writes
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:50:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D8B1C2.1040604@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D8A2D4.2010907@gmail.com>
On 03/03/16 21:47, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> $mount | grep sdf
>> /dev/sdf1 on /mnt/usb type btrfs (rw,relatime,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
> Do you still see the same behavior with the old space_cache format?
> This appears to be an issue of space management and allocation, so
> this may be playing a part.
I just did the clear_cache,space_cache=v1 dance. Now a download with
bandwidth-limit=1M, dirty_expire=20s, commit=30 and *no* autodefrag
first ended up looking like this:
$filefrag -ek linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz is 88362576 (86292 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 7427: 227197920.. 227205347: 7428:
1: 7428.. 33027: 227205348.. 227230947: 25600:
2: 33028.. 53011: 227271164.. 227291147: 19984: 227230948:
3: 53012.. 72995: 227291148.. 227311131: 19984:
4: 72996.. 86291: 227311132.. 227324427: 13296: last,eof
linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz: 2 extents found
Yay! But wait, there's more!
$sync
$filefrag -ek linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz is 88362576 (86292 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 7423: 227197920.. 227205343: 7424:
1: 7424.. 7427: 227169600.. 227169603: 4: 227205344:
2: 7428.. 33023: 227205348.. 227230943: 25596: 227169604:
3: 33024.. 33027: 227169604.. 227169607: 4: 227230944:
4: 33028.. 53007: 227271164.. 227291143: 19980: 227169608:
5: 53008.. 53011: 227230948.. 227230951: 4: 227291144:
6: 53012.. 72991: 227291148.. 227311127: 19980: 227230952:
7: 72992.. 72995: 227230952.. 227230955: 4: 227311128:
8: 72996.. 86291: 227311132.. 227324427: 13296: 227230956: last,eof
linux-4.5-rc6.tar.xz: 9 extents found
Now I'm like ¯\(ツ)/¯
With autodefrag the same happens, though it then eventually does the
merging from 4k -> 256k. I went searching for that hardcoded 256k value
and found it as default in ioctl.c:btrfs_defrag_file() when no threshold
has been passed, as is the case for autodefrag. I'll try to increase that
and see how much I can destroy.
Also, rsync with --bwlimit=1m does _not_ seem to create files like this:
$rsync (..)
$filefrag -ek linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2 is 105008928 (102548 blocks of 1024 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 4095: 227197920.. 227202015: 4096:
1: 4096.. 25599: 227202016.. 227223519: 21504:
2: 25600.. 51199: 227271164.. 227296763: 25600: 227223520:
3: 51200.. 76799: 227296764.. 227322363: 25600:
4: 76800.. 102547: 227322364.. 227348111: 25748: last,eof
linux-4.4.4.tar.bz2: 2 extents found
Which looks exactly as one would expect, probably - as Chris' mail
just explained - it doesn't use O_APPEND, whereas wget apparently does.
> I'd be somewhat curious to see if something similar happens on other
> filesystems with such low writeback timeouts. My thought in this
> case is that the issue is that BTRFS's allocator isn't smart enough
> to try and merge new extents into existing ones when possible.
ext4 creates 1-2 extents, regardless of method.
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-03 12:28 Stray 4k extents with slow buffered writes Holger Hoffstätte
2016-03-03 18:33 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-03 19:53 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-03-03 20:47 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-03-03 21:50 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2016-03-03 22:13 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-04 1:37 ` Liu Bo
2016-03-04 12:17 ` Duncan
2016-03-03 20:55 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D8B1C2.1040604@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.