On 03/03/2016 06:08 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Eric Blake writes: > >> Now that the generator supports it, we might as well use an >> anonymous base rather than breaking out a single-use CpuInfoBase >> structure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake > > Again, introspection value remains the same. > > Patch looks good. > > Should we eliminate more base types? At this point, we only have one other: BlockdevOptions. Yes, I'll add it to the list of cleanups. I also have patches posted in the "subset F" series that converts 'netdev_add' to be introspectible, and which also uses the anonymous base. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org