From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from scarab.smoula.net ([83.240.14.6]:54678 "EHLO scarab.smoula.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753628AbcCEM3r (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Mar 2016 07:29:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scarab.smoula.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AAF462C563 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:29:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from scarab.smoula.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scarab.smoula.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Q-d9bNcU3dOt for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:29:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:5950:dead::d0d0] (interceptor-native.smoula.net [IPv6:2001:470:5950:dead::d0d0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scarab.smoula.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56B68462C55E for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:29:42 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: ENOSPC while creating snapshot References: <20160305034910.576d2230@natsu> To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIE1seW7DocWZ?= Message-ID: <56DAD133.3090101@smoula.net> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 13:29:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5.3.2016 11:46, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: >> Roman Mamedov posted on Sat, 05 Mar 2016 03:49:10 +0500 as excerpted: >> >>> As you use the nodatacow mount option, this seems to be another case of >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg51276.html >>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg51819.html >>> >>> and is fixed by https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7967161/ >>> >>> Unfortunately the bug is known since the start of the 4.4 series and the >>> patch is out for 2 months, but it didn't get included into even 4.4.4 >>> released recently. You have to apply it by yourself and recompile the >>> kernel. >> >> Tho AFAIK it should be in 4.5, which is getting close to release, so if >> you prefer to run 4.5-rcX to applying the patch yourself, that should >> work as well. > > No, it's not in any 4.5-rc. > It's in the integration branch for 4.6, however. Thank you all for your help. Now I'm on 4.5.0-rc6-mainline with pointed patch and issue seems to be resolved. Thank you for your time! -- Martin