From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 15:02:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD276D.1070607@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160307054007.GA8192@linux-uzut.site>
On 2016/3/7 13:40, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2016/3/3 16:36, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Indicates early cleanup, meaning that the test has not run,
>>> + * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module. As
>>> + * such, only perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups,
>>> + * and avoid anything related to locktorture.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!cxt.lwsa)
>>> + goto end;
>>
>> Sorry for the late response, the cxt.lrsa should be taken into account too.
>
> I am taking it into account, note that we kfree lwsa if lrsa fails memory
> allocation. Of course we should be defensive, so go ahead and explicitly set
> it to nil. v2 below, otherwise same patch.
This one looks good, and tested on my board.
>
> -----8<--------------------------
> Subject: [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix nil pointer dereferencing for cleanup paths
>
> It has been found that paths that invoke cleanups through
> lock_torture_cleanup() can incur in nil pointer dereferencing
> bugs during the statistics printing phase. This is mainly
> because we should not be calling into statistics before we are
> sure things have been setup correctly.
>
> Specifically, early checks (and the need for handling this in
> the cleanup call) only include parameter checks and basic
> statistics allocation. Once we start write/read kthreads
> we then consider the test as started. As such, update the func
> in question to check for cxt.lwsa writer stats, if not set,
> we either have a bogus parameter or ENOMEM situation and
> therefore only need to deal with general torture calls
>
> Reported-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
> ---
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index 8ef1919..b5bc243 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,15 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
> if (torture_cleanup_begin())
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Indicates early cleanup, meaning that the test has not run,
> + * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module. As
> + * such, only perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups,
> + * and avoid anything related to locktorture.
> + */
> + if (!cxt.lwsa)
> + goto end;
> +
> if (writer_tasks) {
> for (i = 0; i < cxt.nrealwriters_stress; i++)
> torture_stop_kthread(lock_torture_writer,
> @@ -776,6 +785,7 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
> else
> lock_torture_print_module_parms(cxt.cur_ops,
> "End of test: SUCCESS");
> +end:
> torture_cleanup_end();
> }
>
> @@ -870,6 +880,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
> VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("cxt.lrsa: Out of memory");
> firsterr = -ENOMEM;
> kfree(cxt.lwsa);
> + cxt.lwsa = NULL;
> goto unwind;
> }
>
> @@ -878,6 +889,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
> cxt.lrsa[i].n_lock_acquired = 0;
> }
> }
> +
> lock_torture_print_module_parms(cxt.cur_ops, "Start of test");
>
> /* Prepare torture context. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 4:25 [PATCH v2] locktorture: Fix NULL pointer when torture_type is invalid Kefeng Wang
2016-01-30 2:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-01-31 0:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-01-31 22:17 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-01 2:25 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-02-01 3:02 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-02-01 3:28 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-02-02 6:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-02-03 0:23 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-03-02 19:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-03-02 21:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-03 1:37 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-03-03 4:31 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-03-03 8:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-03-04 18:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-03-07 2:00 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-03-07 5:40 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-03-07 7:02 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2016-03-07 13:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-08 2:10 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-03-08 19:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-03-03 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DD276D.1070607@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.